Signup for a folk alley account

June 26, 2007 is a Day of Silence for Internet Radio

June 26, 2007

Tuesday, June 26, Internet broadcasters come together to support a Day of Silence to demonstrate what the Web would sound like if music streaming was forced to shut down due to increased royalty rates. Folk Alley has decided not to go silent but instead to be loud and proud. Please, if you feel strongly about our service, tell your U.S. Senator and Representative. Already, Congress is hearing your collective voices and they are taking actions to counteract the new rates put in place by the Copyright Royalty Board, which are set to be enacted on July 15. The proposed rates are more than 7 times those paid by satellite broadcasts (radio does not pay these royalties) and must be supported by a complex reporting system that will require many, many man hours each month. The fees will be retroactive to Jan. 1, 2006 and could eventually total more than Folk Alley's yearly budget.

Visit Folk Alley's Save Net Radio page for a full list of U.S. Representatives that have officially added their support to H.R. 2060, the Internet Equality Act and additional information on making your voice heard. This royalty increase affects all webcasters, commercial and public without taking size, public service or financial situation into account (small, independent and educational webcasters will be especially hard hit). We love artists, that's why we want to be around for a long time to come to promote and support folk music, spreading its reach around the globe through Internet streaming.

Speak up! Be loud on the Day of Silence!

Posted by Ann VerWiebe at June 26, 2007 12:01 AM


My represenatives know how I feel, but I'll go on the record here as stating that, IMHO, this move by the CRB was nothing short of a protection grab, a way for the big dogs of the music biz to further limit public venues for anything other than their own mass-produced product.

There were too many new artists slipping thru the safeguards they have built over the years to control music, and they had to find some way to stifle that!

Posted by: Jim Pipkin at June 26, 2007 12:30 PM

There was a really good article in this month's Paste Magazine that quotes John Simson from SoundExchange as saying, "The attitude that really has to change is the idea that the people playing this music on the Web are somehow doing artists a favor" and, "Does having so many Web stations disperse the market so much that it hurts the artist?"

Both of these quotes just blow me away. I'm not saying that we are here to save the artists souls, but how would airplay hurt a musicians career? Do listeners say, "Gee, all of this variety, I really wish there were only a couple of choices, that would make me buy a lot more CDs"? This is the guy behind the CRB's decision. SoundExchange did their homework, they were much more prepared for this fight and so they took home the winning flag. Hopefully, the folks now representing pubcasters can make their case in an effective way. Who I really feel sorry for are the college stations that have lost their terrestrial outlets and now broadcast only online. They have no revenue, but this system does not take that into account - it's "spin" based.

Posted by: Ann E VerWiebe at June 26, 2007 12:41 PM


My friend Phil Gallos from Saranac Lake, NY wholeheartedly agrees with you. This is what he wrote in a letter to me back in March:

“As I see it, this is not an issue of getting royalties to deserving artists. It is an issue of control -- the control of what the citizenry may hear by a relatively small number of powerful corporations and individuals, who have the most to gain through this fee schedule while almost everyone else loses. This kind control, while enriching those who hold it, impoverishes society and thwarts democracy."

Couldn't have said it any better.

Posted by: Linda Fahey at June 26, 2007 3:17 PM

I went briefly to SoundExchange's website today. Their spin on this makes me sick to my stomach. I listen to very little commercial radio (eschewing it for NPR for the most part), largely because the playlists are so narrow, and the DJs are so obnoxious. Any music I have bought (Vienna Teng, Eddie from Ohio to name a few) in the past year or so, I've bought because I heard them on Folk Alley. I can't see how killing internet radio would be good for the artists. It might not hurt Top 40 or Top 20 artists much, since they get so much airtime on traditional radio, but indie artists don't stand much of a chance of being heard on large corporate radio.

My 2¢


Posted by: Deb Holz at June 27, 2007 12:00 AM

I see showers of confetti over the FOLK ALLEY placard/logo-sign on the main page... I'm excited - what are we celebrating!?

Posted by: JoLynn Braswell at June 27, 2007 12:41 AM

Although I see a few representives from my state on the list, I don't see mine. I will be contacting him.

Posted by: Nina Gray at June 27, 2007 12:48 PM

I wrote to my rep, Betty McCollum

Posted by: Richard Schletty at July 3, 2007 4:23 PM

These people are not artist centred or even music centred they have the Great God dollar in their view. They have no interest in the artist, per se. This is the narrow minded and short termist view of the accountant. Do they they not see that dispertion of an artists tracks will encourage people to either download (payable) or buy the CD's (payable). As you can see from the spelling I'm from the UK, we don't have this problem as yet, maybe we have accountants with better long term vision. As we cannot write to our congressional representative or senator (we don't have them), is there anything listeners in the UK or anywhere else outside of the USA can do to help?

Posted by: Katherine Wadsworth at July 4, 2007 4:05 PM

At the same time their could be a very natural backlash in the favor of indy musicians who own their own rights which the mainstream industry may not be expecting.

More music is being purchased only as singles through trends like Ipods. More asrtists are starting to records and release singles. The mainstream industry has already screwed the pooch in terms of unatainable tickets prices. They engage in all kinds of practices that this musicisn would not really want to be a part of. As the distribution mechanisms change, then one has to think of what happened with micro brews in this country. Perhaps stations like Fok alley would seek more independent musicians that are not encombered and who do not favor Association made royalty fees. Perhaps there is a new association to be made.

all the best
jerry h
dream kitchen

Posted by: Jerry H at July 29, 2007 7:33 AM

Folk Alley is very fond of independent artists, and those on smaller labels who seem genuinely interested in getting music to the people. However, SoundExchange does not distinguish - we will have to pay the same for artists that are connected with SoundExchange as for those that are not. SoundExchange says that they will hold the money in trust until the artists come forward to claim it, and after a certain amount of time, it will revert to the organization. In order for Folk Alley not to pay royalties, we would have to negotiate contracts with each artist individually and figure out a way to separate works from those artists from others, including musicians signed to major labels that it would be remiss for us to ignore. The entire situation is very bad regardless.

Posted by: Ann E VerWiebe at July 30, 2007 9:49 AM

Registered users can post comments in the blog. Please register or log in to share your views.

Support Folk Alley During Our Spring Fund Drive!


Recent Topics

Album Review: Lord Huron, 'Strange Trails'
Album Review: Laura Marling, 'Short Movie'
Important information about your Folk Alley account
Album Review: Brandi Carlile, 'The Firewatcher's Daughter'
A Q & A with Martin Sexton
Win Tickets To See Shakey Graves at the Beachland Ballroom
Hear It First - The Pine Hill Project, 'Tomorrow You're Going'
Album Review: The Decemberists, 'What a Terrible World, What a Beautiful World'
PLAYLIST: Folk Alley nationally syndicated radio show #150305
Hear It First - Pharis & Jason Romero, 'A Wanderer I'll Stay'
Folk Alley Presents 'Heaven Adores You' at the Cleveland International Film Festival
Video Premiere: Joel Rafael, "Thanks for the Smiles"
PLAYLIST: Folk Alley nationally syndicated radio show #150226
Album Review: Robert Earl Keen, Happy Prisoner: The Bluegrass Sessions
PLAYLIST: Folk Alley nationally syndicated radio show #150219
Song Premiere: Joe Pug, "The Measure"
Album Review: The Bros. Landreth, 'Let It Lie'
A Q & A with Nora Jane Struthers
Album Review: Andrew Combs, 'All These Dreams'
A Q & A with Rhiannon Giddens
Album Review: Caroline Spence, 'Somehow'
Hear It First - Elana James, 'Black Beauty'
PLAYLIST - Folk Alley nationally syndicated weekly radio show #150212
It Takes Two - Ten Classic Duets for Valentine's Day
PLAYLIST - Folk Alley nationally syndicated weekly radio show #150205
Song Premiere: Ryan Culwell, 'I Think I'll Be Their God"
Hear It First - Jorma Kaukonen, 'Ain't In No Hurry'
Album Review: Drew Holcomb & The Neighbors, 'Medicine'
PLAYLIST - Folk Alley nationally syndicated weekly radio show #150129
Album Review: Gretchen Peters, 'Blackbirds'



March 2015
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31            

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003