Jeff Black - in stores today


Who Deserves a Grammy?

February 2, 2006

The Grammy Awards will be handed out this Wednesday. About a dozen will make it to the live telecast, while most of the 105 awards (yikes!) will be doled out earlier. Folk music will receive at least a passing mention since Pete Seeger and the Weavers are being honored with a lifetime achievement statue. They may even give the prize for contemporary folk album out on air (the woman at the Grammys said they won't know until a couple of days out), since Bruce Springsteen is nominated and he'll be performing on the big night (along with Madonna and Sir Paul McCartney).

Speaking of Bruce... once again the nominees for contemporary folk album bear little relation to the artists who actually call themselves "folk" (traditional folk album is a much more aligned list). I shouldn't blame the Academy, since it's the artists (or their people) who pick the categories they enter. And it's probably too expensive for many folk artists or smaller labels to enter. At least Bruce's album has a narrative, acoustic sensibility (with Warren Zevon, I think they were just so desperate to give him the award that they shoved it in the nearest open hole).

If you were giving out the Grammys, what are your picks for contemporary and traditional folk albums released last year? And, what about best new folk artist (I'm going to say first album, I don't remember the real Grammy criteria)?

Posted by Ann VerWiebe at February 2, 2006 1:41 PM


Comments

The Grammy Awards is a marketing scheme above all else, anyway, so they will seek the biggest names they can come up with to nominate for an award. The category is really irrelevant. If Springsteen went up against most of the real folkies out there for an award, he would have a huge advantage meerly because his name can generate sales in the millions, instead of the thousands that most of the folkies could garner.

Posted by: Jack Swain at February 2, 2006 5:38 PM

Isn't promo part of the Grammy criteria? How effectively the music was marketed? I know it weighs heavily in the Oscars.

Posted by: Jim Pipkin at February 2, 2006 6:39 PM

Rework this into a folk tribute to our great country in spite of the problems! It only makes the common man stronger as he is the backbone to our culture. The women’s rights and black’s history are our truth while the Indian’s struggle makes our heart hurt. Our soul is not lost in the corporate struggle to keep corporate taxes and individual taxes proportional. When a disparity exists the issue must be addressed. The indirect tax is found in the credit industry’s increased targeting of groups who have no control nor associations. No money means no representation, no lobby and no warmth. Electricity is good . . . a blanket’s better . . . and a warm cup of soup is nourishing freedom. Without one there is none. Our weakest link is the strength of our fabric. We must protect our working class to keep them working. Without work there is no soup. We trust our leaders to make wise decisions from the gainful heart, not a pocketbook focused on gainful shareholders. I trust in a better tomorrow. I trust in the folk’s who honor our country. Come on down to folk-alley for some slow sippin’ good times.

Posted by: Jeff Irby at February 2, 2006 11:26 PM

I don't know who votes for Grammys. Members of the Recording Academy, I suppose. How many performers are actually Academy members? With the Oscars, members nominate in their own category (except for best picture) and then everyone votes for the winners. It could be that the Academy is stacked with mainline musicians. I wonder how much dues are to be an Academy member? It's pretty artibrary. By the same token, the Junos seem to nominate folks that are actually working in the field (last year Jenny Whitely won for something and when I went to link up to her album, it took me 10 minutes to even find it anywhere).

Posted by: Ann VerWiebe at February 3, 2006 9:22 AM

It's easy to slam the Grammys, but the question Ann asked is which albums really deserve to win. One 2005 record that was completely ignored by the Grammys really deserves some recognition - that's Jamie Hartford's "Part Of Your History" - a tribute to the songs of his father, John Hartford. I'm truly disappointed that the Grammys didn't give this one a nomination. It's a lovely and truly respectful album that really captures the spirit of the wonderful songs that John Hartford left us. It's beautifully performed and recorded. This one deserves an award.

With respect to the Grammys, it's really the nomination that represents the honor. The award itself tends just to be a popularity contest. Since every academy member gets to vote in every category, people tend to vote for the artists they know - even when they are completely unfamiliar with the category. But the nominations tend to come from those who really know the category well. So I consider the nomination to be the real honor. Winning the award says a lot less.

Incidentally, one marginally "folk" album got nominated for a Grammy in a category that many people may not have noticed. Chris Thile, the incredible mandolist of Nickel Creek, was nominated in the "Best Engineered Album" category for his solo album, Deceiver. As anyone who knows Thile's music would expect, the album is quite varied - ranging from gentle folk to aggressive rock, and showing influences from baroque and jazz and more. But the interesting thing about it is that Chris played and sang EVERY single part on the record - it is truly a "solo" album! Because of the incredible work necessary to produce a record this way, co-producers Chris Thile and Gary Paczosa were nominated for the Grammy.

Posted by: Jimmie Wilson at February 3, 2006 9:49 PM

I loved Bono's comment on the Grammys that U2 is "the world's loudest folk group."

Posted by: Ben McConnell at February 9, 2006 12:12 AM

Say what you want about the Grammy voting, but I have to hand it to them for giving Allison Krauss and Union Station 3 awards over more commercially successful country artists. Every musician in that band is a virtuoso.

Posted by: Todd Brown at February 9, 2006 4:32 PM

OMG ...I had to watch the Grammys. I must be getting old!!

Posted by: Grant Coones at February 9, 2006 5:21 PM

Hello Mr. Wilson! My name is Patti and I work with Jamie Hartford. I have shared your wonderful comments about the CD with Jamie and the producer. You are most kind. Thank you.

"Part of Your History" wasn't eligible for a Grammy this year. The CD was released on a limited basis to only a handfull of longtime supporters of the Hartford's music, like Folk Alley, last summer. However, we did not have national release and distribution until Nov.8. To be in the running for this year's Grammys we would have to have had national distribution before Sept. 30.
Since this year marks the 5th anniversary of John's passing it somehow seems appropriate that we are eligible this year. Personally, I think the CD deserves a Grammy, but I may be just a little biased...

Keep your fingers crossed for us, maybe we'll make the cut this year!


Patti

Posted by: Patti Piatt at February 15, 2006 11:23 PM

Patti, thank you very much for responding and for clarifying the timing of the release of Part Of Your History. I didn't realize that the official release came along so late in the year. I sincerely hope that NARAS recognizes Jamie's CD in the next Grammy cycle. And if any FolkAlley members haven't heard it, I encourage you to listen to it. You can learn about it and hear some of it at:

http://partofyourhistory.com/

Posted by: Jimmie Wilson at February 23, 2006 12:23 AM

Registered users can post comments in the blog. Please register or log in to share your views.

Support Folk Alley During Our Spring Fund Drive!
Signup for a folk alley account

 

Recent Topics

 

 

February 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29